2000 Ford Puma vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 355 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Puma | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2850 mm |