2000 Ford Puma vs. 1954 Jensen 541
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jensen 541. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jensen 541 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jensen 541 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1954 Jensen 541. (112 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1954 Jensen 541. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 55 kg more than 1954 Jensen 541. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Jensen 541 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Jensen 541. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1954 Jensen 541 | |
Make | Ford | Jensen |
Model | Puma | 541 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 3993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 68 L |