2000 Ford Puma vs. 1955 Studebaker Champion
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Studebaker Champion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1955 Studebaker Champion. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1955 Studebaker Champion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Studebaker Champion weights approximately 100 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 1955 Studebaker Champion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Studebaker Champion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1955 Studebaker Champion | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Puma | Champion |
Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 3032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2970 mm |