2000 Ford Puma vs. 1958 Opel Record
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Opel Record. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Opel Record would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Opel Record is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Opel Record is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Opel Record. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1958 Opel Record | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Puma | Record |
Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |