2000 Ford Puma vs. 1958 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,451 cc, 1958 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (89 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1958 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1958 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 200 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1958 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Puma | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1387 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2540 mm |
