2000 Ford Puma vs. 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111. (94 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111. (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111 | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Puma | W 111 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 2195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 169 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 93.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2760 mm |
