2000 Ford Puma vs. 1961 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 75 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1961 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Puma | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1387 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2540 mm |
