2000 Ford Puma vs. 1965 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 420 kg more than 1965 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1965 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Puma | 850 K |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |