2000 Ford Puma vs. 1967 Toyota Century
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Toyota Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Toyota Century would be higher. At 2,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Toyota Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Toyota Century (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Toyota Century should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Toyota Century weights approximately 525 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Toyota Century is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Toyota Century. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Toyota Century (247 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Toyota Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma. 1967 Toyota Century has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 Toyota Century will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1967 Toyota Century | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Puma | Century |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 2981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 247 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 78 mm |
| Top Speed | 202 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2870 mm |
