2000 Ford Puma vs. 1969 Peugeot 204

To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1969 Peugeot 204. (47 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1969 Peugeot 204. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 395 kg more than 1969 Peugeot 204. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Peugeot 204. (84 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Peugeot 204.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Puma 1969 Peugeot 204
Make Ford Peugeot
Model Puma 204
Year Released 2000 1969
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1679 cc 1130 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 153 HP 47 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 84 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4000 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1570 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 L 42 L