2000 Ford Puma vs. 1970 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Monteverdi 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1970 Monteverdi 2000. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1970 Monteverdi 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 1970 Monteverdi 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Monteverdi 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1970 Monteverdi 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Monteverdi |
Model | Puma | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 82 L |