2000 Ford Puma vs. 1972 Holden Belmont

To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1972 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Belmont weights approximately 65 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.

Because 1972 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Holden Belmont (229 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1972 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Puma 1972 Holden Belmont
Make Ford Holden
Model Puma Belmont
Year Released 2000 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1679 cc 2834 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 153 HP 116 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 229 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2000 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 1340 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2830 mm