2000 Ford Puma vs. 1972 Renault 5
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 5 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 545 kg more than 1972 Renault 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1972 Renault 5 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Puma | 5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2410 mm |
