2000 Ford Puma vs. 1974 Mazda Luce
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 2,620 cc, 1974 Mazda Luce is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1974 Mazda Luce. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 20 kg more than 1974 Mazda Luce. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda Luce (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda Luce will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1974 Mazda Luce | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Puma | Luce |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 2620 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2590 mm |