2000 Ford Puma vs. 1976 Subaru 1400
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1976 Subaru 1400 | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Puma | 1400 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1361 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |