2000 Ford Puma vs. 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 425 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Puma | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2000 | 1979 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 4228 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2290 mm |