2000 Ford Puma vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Puma | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4690 mm |