2000 Ford Puma vs. 1984 Mini MK V
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mini MK V would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1984 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1984 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 650 kg more than 1984 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mini MK V. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1984 Mini MK V | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Puma | MK V |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2040 mm |