2000 Ford Puma vs. 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,955 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser (155 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 625 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser (300 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Puma | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 3955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2740 mm |