2000 Ford Puma vs. 1987 Acura Integra
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Acura Integra (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Acura Integra (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1987 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1987 Acura Integra | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Puma | Integra |
Year Released | 2000 | 1987 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4285 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |