2000 Ford Puma vs. 1990 Holden Statesman

To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 4,987 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Holden Statesman (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Holden Statesman should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Holden Statesman weights approximately 290 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1990 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Holden Statesman (386 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1990 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma. 1990 Holden Statesman has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Holden Statesman will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: