2000 Ford Puma vs. 1990 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 630 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1990 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Puma | Continental |
Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2780 mm |