2000 Ford Puma vs. 1991 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1991 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 616 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 1991 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1991 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | Puma | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1387 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1626 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
