2000 Ford Puma vs. 1992 Acura Integra
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1992 Acura Integra. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1992 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Acura Integra. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1992 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Puma | Integra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |
