2000 Ford Puma vs. 1992 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 790 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1992 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Puma | Villager |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2860 mm |