2000 Ford Puma vs. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC would be higher. At 2,962 cc, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC weights approximately 775 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Puma | MCC |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 2962 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 2050 kg |