2000 Ford Puma vs. 1995 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Honda Integra would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1995 Honda Integra. (143 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1995 Honda Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 76 kg more than 1995 Honda Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1995 Honda Integra | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Puma | Integra |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2570 mm |