2000 Ford Puma vs. 1995 Opel Corsa
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Opel Corsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Opel Corsa would be higher. At 1,685 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Opel Corsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1995 Opel Corsa. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1995 Opel Corsa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 195 kg more than 1995 Opel Corsa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Opel Corsa. (112 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Opel Corsa.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1995 Opel Corsa | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Puma | Corsa |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1685 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |