2000 Ford Puma vs. 1995 Saturn SC

To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Saturn SC would be higher. At 1,900 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1995 Saturn SC. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1995 Saturn SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 230 kg more than 1995 Saturn SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Saturn SC. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Saturn SC.

Compare all specifications: