2000 Ford Puma vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda Integra would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 76 kg more than 1996 Honda Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1996 Honda Integra | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Puma | Integra |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 176 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2570 mm |