2000 Ford Puma vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, both 2000 Ford Puma and 2000 Toyota Celica were released in the same year (2000). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 335 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Puma | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 87 L |