2000 Ford Puma vs. 2001 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2001 Subaru Outback is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2001 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Subaru Outback (282 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm). This means 2001 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma. 2001 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Puma 2001 Subaru Outback
Make Ford Subaru
Model Puma Outback
Year Released 2000 2001
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1679 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Horse Power 153 HP 0 HP
Torque 170 Nm 282 Nm
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 89.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.5 mm 80 mm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1590 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2530 mm