2000 Ford Puma vs. 2004 Peugeot 605
To start off, 2004 Peugeot 605 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Peugeot 605 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Peugeot 605 (208 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Peugeot 605 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 395 kg more than 2004 Peugeot 605.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Peugeot 605 (205 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Peugeot 605 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 2004 Peugeot 605 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Puma | 605 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 205 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 880 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 45 L |