2000 Ford Puma vs. 2006 Opel Antara
To start off, 2006 Opel Antara is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,899 cc, 2006 Opel Antara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Antara (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 2006 Opel Antara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Opel Antara (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Opel Antara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma. 2006 Opel Antara has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Opel Antara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 2006 Opel Antara | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Puma | Antara |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 1899 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 542 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |