2000 Ford Puma vs. 2007 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2007 Mazda B3000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 2,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2007 Mazda B3000. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 2007 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Puma | B3000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 2969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 62 L |