2000 Ford Puma vs. 2008 Land Rover Freelander

To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 495 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.

Because 2008 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Puma 2008 Land Rover Freelander
Make Ford Land Rover
Model Puma Freelander
Year Released 2000 2008
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1679 cc 2179 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 153 HP 0 HP
Torque 170 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.5 mm 96 mm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 1770 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4980 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1910 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 L 68 L