2000 Ford Puma vs. 2008 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2008 Toyota Tazz is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 331 kg more than 2008 Toyota Tazz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Tazz. (104 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Tazz.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 2008 Toyota Tazz | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Puma | Tazz |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 77.4 mm |
Top Speed | 202 km/hour | 159 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 944 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |