2000 Ford Puma vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (240 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Puma | 3008 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Top Speed | 202 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2613 mm |
