2000 Ford Puma vs. 2010 Volkswagen Caddy

To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. (101 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 1032 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Puma 2010 Volkswagen Caddy
Make Ford Volkswagen
Model Puma Caddy
Year Released 2000 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1679 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 153 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.5 mm 77.4 mm
Top Speed 202 km/hour 164 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 2307 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2690 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 L 60 L