2000 Ford Puma vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Puma | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 46 L |
