2000 Ford Puma vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,387 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (125 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Puma | Cruze |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2685 mm |