2000 Ford Puma vs. 2012 Nissan Juke

To start off, 2012 Nissan Juke is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Juke weights approximately 59 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Puma 2012 Nissan Juke
Make Ford Nissan
Model Puma Juke
Year Released 2000 2012
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1679 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 153 HP 188 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2000 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 1334 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4125 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2530 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 L 50 L