2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 332 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2850 mm |