2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1955 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 222 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 1955 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ranger | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4785 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1520 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3000 mm |
