2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1956 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 212 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ranger | 1956 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5112 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2600 mm |