2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1956 Triumph 10 Break
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Triumph 10 Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Triumph 10 Break would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 538 kg more than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 1956 Triumph 10 Break | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | 10 Break |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 760 kg |
