2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 (158 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 632 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Ranger | 300 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 71 L |
