2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Maserati 3500
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Maserati 3500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Maserati 3500 would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Maserati 3500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Maserati 3500 (232 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Maserati 3500 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 98 kg more than 1963 Maserati 3500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 1963 Maserati 3500 | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | Ranger | 3500 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3485 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |
