2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 798 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ranger | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Ranger | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 66 L |
