2000 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Opel Rekord

To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1966 Opel Rekord. (89 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Opel Rekord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 233 kg more than 1966 Opel Rekord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Opel Rekord. (149 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Opel Rekord.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Ranger 1966 Opel Rekord
Make Ford Opel
Model Ranger Rekord
Year Released 2000 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 135 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 149 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1298 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 70 L